Skip to main content

THE GRUNGE MATCH - 048

Match 048:

Alice In Chains "Frogs" (1995)
Nirvana "Dumb" (1993)
Pearl Jam "Mankind" (1996)
Soundgarden "She's A Politician" (1992)

"Frogs" is not as bad as I remember now that I take another listen.  It is super long, clocking in at 8:18, and it's the uninteresting kind of slow so that doesn't help its case, but the chorus saves it (though at the five and a half minute mark, the song devolves into the mumbling, free association jammy bullshit I remember it being).  If you cut the last three minutes, it would be perfectly fine, but NOOOO.  Instead it's a wash.

"Dumb" is one of my personal favorites from "In Utero".  It doesn't aspire to be anything greater, but it doesn't underachieve in spite of its lack of intentions.  It's got a cool cello thing going on, it's pretty chill without being a dirge, the lyrics are kind of...well, dumb but since the song is called "Dumb", it fits.  I can vibe to this.

"Mankind" is the first time Stone Gossard takes over singing duties for Pearl Jam.  If he wrote the lyrics, I hope he never does this again, because his voice is okay but the words are infantile rock and roll garbage.  It be gobbletygook, main.  And the music is a bog standard alternative song from 1996.

"She's A Politician" sounds like a re-recording of something from "Ultramega OK".  It's less than two minutes, it's got some sorta cool riffs but a weird, jagged chorus that's sort of off-putting.  Being that they're a MUCH tighter band in 1992, "She's A Politician" comes off much better than the random trash that dragged down much of their full-length debut.  It needs some work, but eh.  Not the worst.

"Dumb": 4
"She's A Politician": 3
"Frogs": 2
"Mankind": 1

TOTALS:

Pearl Jam: 136
Alice In Chains: 128
Nirvana: 109
Soundgarden: 108

Nirvana continues to hang on with all they've got, but tomorrow brings changes.  Yes, "In Utero" has a better side B than side A, but "Superunknown" makes its first mark on the scene.  And fittingly, "Alice In Chains" (the album and the band as we knew them) will be "Over Now".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE GRUNGE MATCH - Conclusion

This has certainly been a heck of a thing.

Writing this started out as a labor of love to a subgenre of rock and roll that came along at the perfect time for me (both when I was entering middle school in the bottom 5 of the popularity pecking order and when I started buying albums at the impressionable age of 11).  It obviously took a long time to put together: August 29th, 2016 is when I began planning, May 24th is when I wrote the last entry, the wee hours of August 1st, 2017 is when I finished proofreading and uploading the entries to the blog with video links, and here I am typing these words on August 15th.

The elephant in the room is this genre seems to be built on death.  Three of the four frontmen of these bands are dead, one of which occurred during the run of this series.  (Shouts to Alice In Chains bassist Mike Starr as well.  R.I.P.)  On top of that, Pearl Jam only exists because the lead singer of Mother Love Bone died, causing that band to break up.  If you go down the nex…

WHAT THE HELL IS A BLOG? - iTunes Music Reviews, April 2018

Being that it's been more than a year since I've attempted one of these and iTunes is gonna stop selling mp3's next year, this is probably my next to last chance to do this sort of thing.  I started doing hot take reviews of albums based off nothing but 30 second iTunes previews in 2007, and if I'd been smart, I'd've transitioned to YouTube with them in about 2009.  I didn't, so here we are.  If reading a slightly older gentleman trying to temper his apathy and vexation at modern pop music and give it a fair shake (or trying to be funny when shitting on things that he can't resist shitting on) is your jam, step up to the dance floor!

Scoring system goes from 0 stars (sometimes negative if it goes the extra mile of horrible) to five stars (which has happened three times in 11 years of doing this, and I'd take every one of them back because that's the thing with hot takes).  Here we go!


Cardi B "Invasion Of Privacy" ❂ & 1/2
(or ❂❂, dep…

WHO IS CHAMPION OF WRESTLEMANS?!?!? Wrestlemania IV VS Wrestlemania 34

Welcome to this crazy, ridiculous idea.  So, I've done current Wrestlemania cards VS old Wrestlemania cards before, but this one is different.  Wrestlemania IV was dominated by a one night tournament for the vacant WWF title (the only time Vacant got to main event Mania!).  It had a handful of other matches, but it was mostly about the fourteen man tournament for the belt.  So we're gonna do a 32-man tournament for the crown of Wrestlemania Champion!

Here's how it shakes out: I picked sixteen wrestlers from Wrestlemania 34 (one of which isn't official, but they've teased Undertaker so goddam hard I would be forgiven if it turns out to be an elaborate swerve) and sixteen from Wrestlemania IV.  I had to include the participants of the Intercontinental Title match from that one as well, since the tournament only had 14 wrestlers.  (Hogan & Andre got a first round bye and it was a whole thing.)  For this year, I picked the participants from the WWE and Universal t…